Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Ind. 210 - Utley v. State

Utley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
July 1986
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently July 1986

11 state decisions

601950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kruger v. State · Bowen v. State · Miller v. State · Fausett v. State · Bradley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Even if this witness were in error as to his answers, still no reversible error has been presented as to variance, since such error may only be saved by objecting to the evidence, which is a variance, at the time of its introduction at the trial, and if there be error in the court’s ruling on the admission of such evidence, it must be assigned as a cause for a new trial, [citing authorities.] There were no objections made to the testimony as to the place from which the victims had been kidnapped, and there was no error in any ruling by the trial court in this matter.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.