State v. Costa’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

cited by 83 later decisions

states following

May 2012

most recently cited

83 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently May 2012 · most notably Hankins v. State (1983), 505 So. 2d 1067 - Donahoo v. State (1986)

83 state decisions

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · Spencer v. Aetna Life & Casualty Insurance · State v. Wilkins · State v. White & Stewart · State v. Rueckert

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

““An accused may effectively waive the right to have counsel present during any police interrogation. The fact that he has previously retained counsel does not necessarily make inadmissible a voluntary statement made by the defendant in his counsel’s absence. State v. Johnson, 223 Kan. 237, 243 , 573 P.2d 994 (1977); State v. Taylor, 217 Kan. 706 , Syl. ¶ 5, 538 P.2d 1375 (1975); see State v. Jones, 220 Kan. 136, 138-39 , 551 P.2d 801 (1976).” 228 Kan. at 314 .”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. O'NEAL · State v. Morgan
““(6) The prosecuting attorney shall endorse the names of all witnesses known to said attorney upon the complaint, information and indictment at the time of filing the same. Said attorney may endorse thereon the names of other witnesses as may afterward become known to said attorney, at such times as the court may by rule or otherwise prescribe.””
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. 10 Kan. App. 2d 666 - State v. Hanks · State v. Ferguson, Washington & Tucker
““The fact a suspect is the focus of an investigation, standing alone, does not trigger the need for a Miranda warning, but it may be one of the determinative factors in arriving at a decision whether such a warning is needed. State v. Edwards, 224 Kan. at 269 ; State v. Bohanan, 220 Kan. at 129 ; State v. Carson, 216 Kan. at 715.” State v. Costa, 228 Kan. 308, 312, 613 P.2d 1359 (1980).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
e.g. State v. Goering

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.