Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Kan. 693 - State v. Hearron

State v. Hearron’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

33
cited by 33 later decisions
2
states following
July 2011
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently July 2011 · most notably State v. Beach (2003), State v. Lashley (1983)

2 federal appellate · 31 state decisions

1101980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Davis v. Alaska · 7 Cal. 3d 812 - People v. Salas · State v. Squire · Commonwealth v. Kelly · Commonwealth v. Alston

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[The victim’s] property stolen in Arkansas was brought into Wilson County, Kansas. Time, distance, and the causal relationship between the underlying felony and killing are factors to be considered in determining whether the killing is a part of the felony and therefore subject to the felony murder rule. Whether the underlying felony had been abandoned or completed prior to the killing so as to remove it from the ambit of the felony murder rule is ordinarily a question of fact for the jury to decide. [Citation omitted.] When the evidence is conclusive, as a matter of law, and the murder occurred within the res gestae of the crime, the trial court need not instruct that determination of whether the murder occurred within the res gestae is a fact question for the jury. [Citation omitted.]””
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.