Bishop v. Armstrong’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1931
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Richie v. Owsley · Holman v. Parsons · Pursifull v. Pineville Banking Co. · Chapman v. Farris · Robertson v. Donelan
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““A tenant is, until possession is restored to the landlord, estopped to deny or question his landlord’s title, and a proceeding of forcible detainer raises no issue except that of possession; but either party may introduce evidence of title to show the character and extent of his possession. Chapman v. Farris, 195 Ky. 362 , 242 S. W. 359 ; Holman v. Parsons, 162 Ky. 454 , 172 S. W. 920 ; Richie v. Owsley, 137 Ky. 63 , 121 S. W. 1015 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hines v. Perkins
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.