Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Ky. 286 - Moore Et Ux. v. Smith

Moore Et Ux. v. Smith’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
1
states following
April 1966
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently April 1966

15 state decisions

4019291930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Bedford v. Hamilton · Strangway v. Allen · Hampton v. Alcorn · Walker v. Crockett · Capper v. Short Et Ux.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * If the adoption was legal in Colorado, it is legal here.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.