Dillender v. Wilson’s Empirical Analysis
1929
Citation profile
1 district · 11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently March 1985
1 district · 11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Higginbothom v. Higginbothom · Nance's Executors v. Akers · Reynolds' v. Reynolds · Carter v. Carter · Newcomb v. Newcomb
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If a devisee or legatee dies before the testator, or is dead at the making of the will, leaving issue who survive the testator, such issue shall take the estate devised' or bequeathed, as the devisee or legatee would have done if he had survived the testator, unless a different disposition thereof is made or required by the will.””
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Belew v. Sharp · Taylor v. Minish““If section 4841 of the Statutes may not be applied to the simple facts of this case,, we hardly see how it could ever be made effective. We have the sole devisee of the entire estate dying before the testator, leaving a child surviving her. It is suggested that this statute was intended to include only children or lineal descendants of the testator and not strangers in blood. Such a construction would violate the clearly expressed terms of the act and destroy its purpose and effect.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Where the bequest is of the entire estate, no matter how it may have been changed in form or character, it is just as capable of passing under the will on the death of testator as on the date it was executed. Hence there was no ademption of the devise to the widow of testator.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.