Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 LA 385 - Conner v. Lake

Conner v. Lake’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1984
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1984

5 state decisions

201955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Smith v. Southern Kraft Corporation · Read v. Hewitt · Tremont Lumber Co. v. Powers & Critchett Lumber Co. · Pack v. Chapman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “inasmuch as there is no solidary obligation between the bank and the remainder of the defendants the suit, as to the bank, will have to be dismissed.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to be taken into consideration in the rendition of judgment on the merits.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.