Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Md. 281 - Ridley v. State

Ridley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

28
cited by 28 later decisions
2
states following
January 2001
most recently cited

28 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 28 later decisions — most recently January 2001 · most notably Winder v. State (2001), Putnam v. State (1964)

28 state decisions

16019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Felkner v. State · Hyde v. State · Cooper v. State · Holtman v. State · Shipley v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The actual intention at the time of the breaking is controlling, not whether any goods of value were found and stolen, and the intention may be inferred from the circumstances.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.