State v. Braverman’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
9 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1681 (§ 901 of the Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1988 · 42 U.S.C. § 2000B · 42 U.S.C. § 2000C · 42 U.S.C. § 2000D
Relies on Will v. Michigan Department of State Police · Alyeska Pipeline Service Company v. Wilderness Society · Hafer v. Melo · Bankers & Shippers Insurance v. Electro Enterprises Inc. · Carter v. Greenhow
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Yet, if those issues were sufficiently novel, difficult, and debatable to justify dismissing portions of the complaint and denying cross-motions for summary judgment, they must also have been sufficient to justify the State in defending the case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“decide the case not on the basis of what the plaintiffs might have done, but on the basis of what they actually did.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent“When, however, a party does not incur any expense for attorney's fees, those fees cannot be reimbursed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissent
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.