Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Md. App. 27 - Johnson v. State

228 Md. App. 27 - Johnson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2016

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
1
states following
November 2021
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Frye · Monoker v. State · Snowden v. State · Chaney v. State · Lorraine v. Markel American Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Courts have looked to the charging document, jury instructions, verdict sheet, and evidence introduced at trial to determine whether ambiguity existed”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “(1) the required evidence test; (2) the rule of lenity; and (3) the principle of fundamental fairness.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “only if it is manifestly wrong and substantially injurious.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.