Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

228 Mich. 338

200 N.W 148

Bailey v. Loomis

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1924

Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1924-10-06

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 1949

1 federal appellate ·

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1924-10-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1I am for affirmance. I cannot hold that the errors complained of have resulted in a miscarriage of justice. I think the judgment just. I agree with Mr. Justice McDONALD that the court was in error in ordering the testimony taken before the magistrate to be open to the view of counsel for plaintiff, but inasmuch as this was not in the presence of the jury and no use thereof made before the jury the error was without prejudice. Such testimony could not be used for any purpose by either side in this action.

¶2The judgment is affirmed, with costs to plaintiff.

¶3BIRD, STEERE, and FELLOWS, JJ., concurred with WIEST, J. *349

/228/mich/338 · .json · Public domain