Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Minn. 379 - Dahlgren v. Olson

Dahlgren v. Olson’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
July 1978
most recently cited

5 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Schimmelpfennig v. Gaedke · Hubachek v. Hazzard · Armstrong v. Wann · Putnam v. How · Esterly-Hoppin Co. v. Burns

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * But the various decisions of this court have established the rule that, if an agent is instrumental in bringing together a proposed purchaser and seller, the fact that the owner himself made the sale would not release him from his responsibility to the agent for his commission as the procuring cause.” 228 Minn. 388 , 37 N.W.2d 443 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.