228 N.C. App. 234 - State v. Pemberton’s Empirical Analysis
2013
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Strickland v. Washington · Wiggins v. Smith, Warden · Massaro v. United States · Roper Superintendent Potosi Correctional Center v. Simmons · Miller v. Alabama
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“First, the defendant must show that counsel's performance was deficient. This requires showing that counsel made errors so serious that counsel was not functioning as the "counsel" guaranteed the defendant by the Sixth Amendment. Second, the defendant must show that the deficient performance prejudiced the defense. This requires showing that counsel's errors were so serious as to deprive the defendant of a fair trial, a trial whose result is reliable.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“In order to obtain relief on the basis of an ineffective assistance of counsel claim, Defendant is required to demonstrate that his trial counsel's performance was deficient and that this deficient performance prejudiced the defense.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“State v. Banks, 210 N.C.App. 30 , 49, 706 S.E.2d 807 , 821 (2011) (internal quotation marks omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.