Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 N.C. App. 248 - State v. Poole

228 N.C. App. 248 - State v. Poole’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
July 2015
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Mathews v. Eldridge · McDonald v. City of Chicago · Cohens v. Virginia · MacKey v. Montrym · United States v. James Daniel Good Real Property

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Upon issuance of an emergency or ex parte order pursuant to this Chapter, the court shall order the defendant to surrender to the sheriff all firearms, machine guns, ammunition, permits to purchase firearms, and permits to carry concealed firearms that are in the care, custody, possession, ownership, or control of the defendant if the court finds any of the following factors: (1) The use or threatened use of a deadly weapon by the defendant or a pattern of prior conduct involving the use or threatened use of violence with a firearm against persons. (2) Threats to seriously injure or kill the aggrieved party or minor child by the defendant. (3) Threats to commit suicide by the defendant. (4) Serious injuries inflicted upon the aggrieved party or minor child by the defendant.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “to order a defendant to surrender his firearms, the court must find one of the statutory factors justifying that action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “requires the state to engage in prompt remedial action adverse to an individual['s] [property or liberty] interest [s]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.