Blitzkie v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2 district · 45 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 47 later decisions — most recently May 2024 · most notably Wilson v. Misko (1993), Concerned Citizens of Kimball County, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Control (1993)
2 district · 45 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Rosnick v. Marks · Bittner v. Miller · Catania v. University of Nebraska · Wickersham v. State · Corn Belt Products Company v. Mullins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 47 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Any action, other than actions mentioned in sections 25-401 to 25-403, may be brought (1) in the county where any defendant resides, (2) in the county where the cause of action arose, (3) in the county where the transaction or some part of the transaction occurred out of which the cause of action arose, or (4) if all defendants are nonresidents of this state, in any county. When an action has been commenced in any other county, the court in which the action has been commenced shall have jurisdiction over the action, but upon timely motion by a defendant, the court shall transfer the action to the proper court in a county in which such action might have been properly commenced. The court in the county to which the action is transferred, in its discretion, may order the plaintiff or the plaintiff’s attorney to pay to the defendant all reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the defendant because of the improper venue or in proceedings to transfer the action.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Misko““Where the court has general jurisdiction of the subject matter, the right of a defendant to be sued in a particular county or district is a mere personal privilege which he may waive.” 92 C. J.S. Venue § 77 at 11A (1955). See, also, id., § 124 at 820: “Venue statutes are generally regarded as conferring a personal privilege which may be waived by the defendant.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.