Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Neb. 622 - State v. Davis

State v. Davis’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 1992
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Hurlburt · State v. Davis · State v. Dillon

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A motion for postconviction relief cannot be used to secure review of issues which have already been litigated on direct appeal, or which were known to the defendant and counsel at the time of trial and which were capable of being raised, but were not raised, in the defendant’s direct appeal. State v. Hurlburt, 221 Neb. 364 , 377 N.W.2d 108 (1985). In an appeal involving a proceeding for postconviction relief, the trial court’s findings will be upheld unless such findings are clearly erroneous.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.