Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 NW2D 42 - Hack v. Auger

Hack v. Auger’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
1
states following
February 2008
most recently cited

12 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2008

12 state decisions

601975198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on John McDonald v. Commonwealth of Massachusetts · Ratcliff v. Bruce · Creek Nation v. McGhee · Keasling Ex Rel. Keasling v. Thompson · Jenness v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Whoever has been twice convicted of a crime, sentenced, and committed to prison, in this or any other state, * * * for terms of not less than three years each shall, upon conviction of a felony * * * be deemed to be a habitual criminal, and shall be punished by imprisonment in the penitentiary for a term of not more than twenty-five years * * ” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The purpose of this rule is to permit the petitioner to show cause why an issue which should have been raised was not. Perhaps he can justify such failure if given the opportunity to do so.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “It is axiomatic that “[a]ll persons not be treated alike to meet constitutional standards of equal protection. It is enough if all members of the same class are treated equally.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.