¶2John R. Kroger, Attorney General, Erika L. Hadlock, Acting Solicitor General, and Paul L. Smith, Assistant Attorney-in-Charge, Criminal Appeals, for petition.
¶3Before BREWER, Chief Judge, and LANDAU, Judge, and ORTEGA, Judge.
¶4PER CURIAM.
¶5The state petitions for reconsideration. In State v. Mills,219 Or.App. 225, 182 P.3d 889 (2008), we granted defendant's petition for reconsideration, vacated our prior decision, State v. Mills,215 Or.App. 112, 168 P.3d 338 (2007), and remanded for resentencing in light of State v. Ice,343 Or. 248, 170 P.3d 1049 (2007). Ice, however, subsequently was reversed. Oregon v. Ice,555 U.S. ___, 129 S.Ct. 711, 172 L.Ed.2d 517 (2009). The state now argues that, in light of Ice, our remand for resentencing was erroneous. The state is correct that the case is controlled by the United States Supreme Court's decision in Ice. Accordingly, on reconsideration, we withdraw our former opinion and affirm.
¶6Reconsideration allowed; former opinion withdrawn; affirmed.