Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 S.C. 277 - Sparrow v. NERZIG

Sparrow v. NERZIG’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
July 2002
most recently cited

2 district · 6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently July 2002

2 district · 6 state decisions

30195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Kline v. Burke Construction Co. · Sibbach v. Wilson & Co. · Ponzi v. Fessenden · Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis v. Thompson · Covell v. Heyman

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A pleading shall state as a counterclaim any claim which at the time of serving the pleading the pleader has against any opposing party, if it arises out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the opposing party’s claim and does not require for its adjudication the presence of third parties of whom the court cannot acquire jurisdiction, except that such a claim need not be so stated if at the time the action was commenced the claim was the subject of another pending action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.