Lobell v. Rosenberg’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 68 So. 3d 1099 - Favrot v. Favrot · 5 So. 3d 927 - Lalla v. Calamar, N.V. · 402 So. 2d 282 - Carpenter v. Travelers Ins. Co. · 527 So. 2d 1099 - STATE, DOTD v. Estate of Summers · Kenneth H. Lobell v. Cindy Ann Rosenberg
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“). - Lobell v. Rosenberg , 14-0060, (La. App. 4 Cir. 1/7/15), 158 So.3d 874 writ granted , 15-0247 (La. 5/1/15), 169 So.3d 366 , and rev'd , 15-0247 (La. 10/14/15), 186 So.3d 83 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lobell v. Denn“reviewing this matter in its current procedural posture would promote piecemeal appeals and contravene the principles of judicial economy.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Burford v. Burford“to alter the phraseology of the judgment, but not its substance, or to correct errors of calculation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Lobell v. Denn
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.