Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

228 So. 3d 200

State v. Neff

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided October 27, 2017

Supreme Court of Louisiana · decided 2017-10-27

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on 338 So. 2d 584 - State v. Crosby

Decided 2017-10-27

¶1ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE COURT OF APPEAL, FIFTH CIRCUIT, PARISH OF ST. JOHN THE BAPTIST

PER CURIAM:

¶2| j Denied. Relator’s guilty plea waived all non-jurisdictional defects in the proceedings leading to his conviction. State v. Crosby, 338 So.2d 584, 586 (La. 1976).

¶3Relator has now fully litigated his application for post-conviction relief in state court. Similar to federal habeas relief, see 28 U.S.C. § 2244, Louisiana post-conviction procedure envisions the filing of a second or successive application only under the narrow circumstances provided in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.4 and within the limitations period as set out in La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8. Notably, the legislature in 2013 La. Acts 251 amended that article to make the procedural bars against successive filings mandatory. Relator’s claims have now been fully litigated in accord with La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.6, and this denial is final. Hereafter, unless he can show that one of the narrow exceptions authorizing the filing of a successive application applies, relator has exhausted his right to state collateral review. The district court is ordered to record a minute entry consistent with this per curiam.

/228/so3d/200 · .json · Public domain