Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 SO3D 677 - Matias v. State

Matias v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2017

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
February 2019
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 206 So. 3d 5 - Thomas Kelsey v. State of Florida

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We agree ... that it usually may be unnecessary for a court to include language in a sentencing document providing for the right to judicial review of a sentence, as subsection (4) provides that the offender initiates the sentence review by submitting an application to the trial court requesting that a sentence review hearing be held. After receiving this application, it is mandatory for a trial court to conduct the review. § 921.1402(6).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.