Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

228 So. 3d 730

Hill v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided October 27, 2017

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 2017-10-27

Relies on 65 So. 3d 103 - Francis v. State

Decided 2017-10-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1We' affirm Jesse Hill’s convictions, but remand for the entry of a proper nunc pro tunc order finding Hill competent to stand trial. See Francis v. State, 65 So.3d 103 (Fla. 5th DCA 2011) (holding that where trial court made oral findings that defendant was competent but failed to enter written order of competency, proper remedy was to affirm judgment and -remand case to trial court for entry of nunc pró tunc order finding defendant competent to stand trial).

¶2AFFIRMED; REMANDED WITH DIRECTIONS TO ENTER PROPER NUNC PRO TUNC ORDER.

COHEN, C.J., and EVANDER and BERGER, JJ., concur.
/228/so3d/730 · .json · Public domain