Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 SW3D 413 - In Re Merriam

In Re Merriam’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 2016
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In Re Kuntz · Grossnickle v. Grossnickle · In the Interest of Gonzalez · Eikenhorst v. Eikenhorst · Johnson v. Johnson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Authorizing the appellate court to supersede enforcement of the order suggests the appellate court may do so to allow review of the order by the appellate court in the pending appeal. We see nothing in the statute that deprives the appellate court of jurisdiction to consider the issue with the merits of the pending appeal from the final judgment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Because the order does not require [relator] to pay the attorney’s fees until the conclusion of an unsuccessful appeal, he will not be harmed if he is required to raise the issue in his pending appeal from the final judgment. See, e.g., Love, 217 S.W.3d at 36 . Under the circumstances, [relator] has not shown appeal is an inadequate remedy.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.