Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 SW3D 592 - State v. McElvain

State v. McElvain’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
December 2016
most recently cited

9 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on California v. Trombetta · Arizona v. Youngblood · State v. Forrest · State v. Dodson · State v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““(1) The opportunity of the witness to view the criminal at the time of the crime; (2) the witness’s degree of attention; (3) the accuracy of the witnesses] prior description of the criminal; (4) the level of certainty demonstrated by the witness at the confrontation, and (5) the length of time between the crime and the confrontation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.