Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 U.S. 585 - Helena Bugajewitz v. Louis Adams D C

Helena Bugajewitz v. Louis Adams D C’s Empirical Analysis

228 U.S. 585 · 1913

Citation profile

295
cited by 295 later decisions
56
cited 56 times by the Supreme Court
4
states following
November 2018
most recently cited

126 federal appellate · 33 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 295 later decisions (56 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 2018 · most notably Ingraham v. Wright (1977), Trop v. Dulles (1958)

126 federal appellate · 33 district · 8 state decisions

76019131920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yick Wo v. Hopkins · Wong Wing v. United States · Japanese Immigrant Case · United States v. Ju Toy · Union Pacific Railway Co. v. Taggart

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 295 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The determination [by an administrative body that an alien should be deported] by facts that might constitute a crime under local law is not a conviction of crime, nor is the deportation a punishment; * *”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““The effect of striking out the three-year clause from section 3 is nor changed by the reference to 'sections 20 and 21. The change in the phraseology of the reference indicates the narrowed purpose. The prostitute is to bo deported, not ‘as provided,’ but ‘in the manner provided,’ in sections 20, 21. Those sections provide the means for securing deportation, and it still was proper to point to them for that.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.