Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 A.2d 201 - Levasseur v. Dubuc

Levasseur v. Dubuc’s Empirical Analysis

1967

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 2001
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2001

4 state decisions

1019671970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on City of Lewiston v. Grant · Coombs v. Lenox Realty Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[i]n view of the fact that the [municipal ordinance in question], and the enabling act under which it was adopted, are both silent as to the provision that a violation constitutes a nuisance, we hold that [the prede cessor of section 4302] is not effective under the legal aspects of the instant case.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.