¶1The verdict, in our opinion, was not against the weight of the evidence, but was in conformity therewith. The order appealed from, however, should be affirmed, with costs, upon the ground that the amount of the verdict was excessive. Present — Dowling, P. J., Merrell, Martin, O’Malley and Sherman, JJ.; O’Malley, J., dissents and votes to reverse and reinstate the verdict. Order affirmed, with costs and disbursements.
229 A.D. 757
Dooley v. Krellenstein
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 15, 1930
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1930-05-15
Decided 1930-05-15