Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 A.D.2d 601

People v. Rodriguez

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · decided 1996-07-29

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently September 1999

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1996-07-29

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Egitto, J.), rendered June 21, 1995, convicting her of burglary in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, and grand larceny in the fourth degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

¶2Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

¶3The defendant was not entitled to a circumstantial evidence charge herein because the case did not rest entirely upon circumstantial evidence (see, People v Roldan, 88 NY2d 826; see also, People v Daddona, 81 NY2d 990; People v Sills, 215 AD2d 412; People v O’Brien, 212 AD2d 741, 742).

¶4We have examined the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Rosenblatt, J. P., Santucci, Joy and Hart, JJ., concur.

/229/ad2d/601 · .json · Public domain