Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 ARK 811 - Morgan v. Daniels

Morgan v. Daniels’s Empirical Analysis

1958

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
October 1975
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 1975

6 state decisions

20195819601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on DeLong v. Green · Dedmon v. Thalheimer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Are any of the jurors working for or have yon been working for or do any of yon or any of your kins-people work for Travelers Insurance Company? Are any of the jurors employed by a liability insurance company or engaged in the insurance business? Have any of you ever been employed by a liability insurance company or do you own any stock in a liability insurance company at the present time?””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “*** Since any holder of a mutual policy on the panel would have recognized that his or her company was not involved, they would likewise have known that their dividend credit would not be affected by the outcome of the litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““. . . under our holding in DeLong v. Green, 229 Ark. 100 , 313 S. W. 2d 370 , such a statement by the court, if properly objected to by appellee, would have necessitated a reversal, had appellant obtained a judgment.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.