Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 ARK 956 - Quinn v. Stuckey

Quinn v. Stuckey’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
2
states following
March 1987
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1987

9 state decisions

601959196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mueller v. Light · Price v. Price · McKinnon v. McKinnon · McGinnis v. Less · Williams v. Williams

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““At the outset it is well to state the rule for testing a case on demurrer. In Tyler v. Morgan, 214 Ark. 667 , 217 S. W. 2d 606 , we said: “ ‘Appellees demurred to this complaint on the ground that it did not state facts, sufficient to constitute a cause of action. The trial court sustained the demurrer and this appeal followed. ‘ ‘ ‘ The question presented is: Treating all allegations in the complaint, which are well pleaded, as true, and construing them liberally in favor of the pleader, as we must, was a cause of action stated? We bold that there was. “It is not necessary that the complaint should state a cause of action in every particular, for if it contains the substance of a cause of action imperfectly stated, the presumption would be that the defects in the complaint were cured by the proof at the trial.” Clow v. Watson, 124 Ark. 388 , 187 S. W. 175 .’ ””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.