Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 B.R. 461 - In Re Doherty

In Re Doherty’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
October 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2018

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

120199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1226 · 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 548

Relies on Murphy v. John Hofman Co. · Jones v. Jackson · Nash v. Kester · Weston v. Rodriguez · Lugo v. De Jesus Saez

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The Bankruptcy Code grants protection to debtors and their property in quite specific provisions. The automatic stay provision of § 362 protects both the debtors and the property of their estates. Those protections terminate upon the dismissal of the case. The language of § 1326(a)(2) does not clearly extend those protections beyond the entry of the order of dismissal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.