In Re Doherty’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2018
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 1226 · 11 U.S.C. § 1306 · 11 U.S.C. § 1326 · 11 U.S.C. § 348 · 11 U.S.C. § 349 · 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 541 · 11 U.S.C. § 548
Relies on Murphy v. John Hofman Co. · Jones v. Jackson · Nash v. Kester · Weston v. Rodriguez · Lugo v. De Jesus Saez
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The Bankruptcy Code grants protection to debtors and their property in quite specific provisions. The automatic stay provision of § 362 protects both the debtors and the property of their estates. Those protections terminate upon the dismissal of the case. The language of § 1326(a)(2) does not clearly extend those protections beyond the entry of the order of dismissal.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.