Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 CONN 247 - Paupack Development Corp. v. Conservation Commission

Paupack Development Corp. v. Conservation Commission’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2019

9 state decisions

40199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Nollan v. California Coastal Commission · Lauer v. Zoning Commission · Conservation Commission v. Price · Fahy v. Fahy · McCallum v. Inland Wetlands Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(a) The following operations and uses shall be permitted in wetlands and watercourses, as of right: . . . CT Page 8135 (2) A residential home (i) for which a building permit has been issued or (ii) on a subdivision lot, provided the permit has been issued or the subdivision has been approved by a municipal planning, zoning or planning and zoning commission as of the effective date of promulgation of the municipal regulations pursuant to subsection (b) of section 22a-42a or as of July 1, 1974, whichever is earlier, and further provided no residential home shall be permitted as of right pursuant to this subdivision unless the permit was obtained on or before July 1, 1987.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “The language of P.A. 87-533 sets another deadline, and by its plain language is applicable to statutory subdivision (a)(2)(ii), the existing exemption for the subdivision of real property. Such a reading of P.A. 87-533 eliminated the as of right exemption for undeveloped subdivisions existing prior to 1974 for which a building permit had not been issued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “` and further provided no residential home shall be permitted as of right pursuant to this subdivision unless the permit was obtained on or before July 1, 1987 . . . .'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.