Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 F.1d 392 - Murdock v. Pollock

Murdock v. Pollock’s Empirical Analysis

229 F. 392 · 1915

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
January 1960
most recently cited

16 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently January 1960

16 federal appellate ·

100191519201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Royall · 'The Ku-Klux Cases' Yarbrough · Boardman v. Toffey · Erickson v. Hodges · In re Jordan

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““As this return is precisely the same that the superintendent would make if the writ of habeas corpus had been served on him, the court here can determine the right of the prisoners to he released on this rule to show cause, as correctly and with more convenience in the administration of justice, than if the prisoners were present under the writ in the custody of the superintendent; and such is the practice of this court.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.