Bates v. Dresser’s Empirical Analysis
229 F. 772 · 1915
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently November 1961
3 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Kimberly v. Arms · Davis v. Schwartz · Auten v. United States National Bank · Herrmann v. Edwards · International Trust Co. v. Weeks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““to examine into the affairs of the bank, to count its cash, and compare its -assets and liabilities with the balances on the general ledger, for the purpose of ascertaining whether or not the books are correctly kept and the condition of the bank in a sound and solvent condition, the result of which examination shall be reported to the board at their next regular meeting,””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Dresser v. Bates
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.