Rashap v. Brownell’s Empirical Analysis
229 F.2d 193 · 1956
Citation profile
8 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 10 later decisions — most recently August 1998
8 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2401
Relies on United States v. Sherwood · United Artists Corporation v. Masterpiece Productions, Inc., and Robert S. Benjamin, Arthur B. Krim, Seymour M. Peyser · National Safe Deposit Co. v. Stead · Technical Tape Corp. v. Minnesota Mining & Mfg. Co. · Sutorius v. Mayor
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ * * * Nq practical reasons suggest themselves for extending the law of possession from the corporation, as the parties intended, to its officers, as they clearly did not intend, but wished to avoid by choosing the corporate device.” 229 F.2d at page 195.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rashap v. Brownell““The documentary records before the court below show beyond question this possession of the corporation ; and plaintiff’s claim has to be, and is, based upon his right of access to the safe deposit box as an'officer and in the right of the corporation.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rashap v. Brownell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.