United States v. Miller’s Empirical Analysis
229 F.2d 839 · 1956
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 28 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2014 · most notably United States v. Yazell (1966), Federal Deposit Insurance v. Deglau (2000)
10 federal appellate · 3 district · 3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Commonwealth State Emp. Ret. System v. Dau. Co. · HOFFMAN v. PITTSBURGH · Baker v. Kirschnek · Culver v. Commonwealth · Reconstruction Finance Corp. v. Breeding
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 28 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““If the statute is not applicable to the state of Pennsylvania in its transactions with persons in the State’s field of activity, it is equally inapplicable to the United States dealing with persons in Pennsylvania within the federal government’s field of activity.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.