United States v. Whitney’s Empirical Analysis
229 F.3d 1296 · 2000
Citation profile
58 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 99 later decisions — most recently December 2023 · most notably United States v. Gonzalez-Huerta (2005), United States v. Dazey (2005)
58 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Olano · United States v. Shabani · McGee v. County of Orange · Holloway v. United States · United States v. Christian
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 99 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the Government must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant acted with the specific intent to injure, intimidate or interfere with the victim because of [his] race and because of the victim's occupation of [his] home.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a]n error is clear and obvious when it is contrary to well-settled law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“(I) ... an offense under federal, state, or local law that has as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force against the person of another; and (II) includes murder, manslaughter, kidnapping, aggravated assault, forcible sex offenses (including sexual abuse of a minor), robbery, arson, extortion, extortionate extension of credit, and burglary of a dwelling.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.