Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 F.3d 478 - Daniel Turner v. Houma Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board

Daniel Turner v. Houma Municipal Fire and Police Civil Service Board’s Empirical Analysis

229 F.3d 478 · 2000

Citation profile

59
cited by 59 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 59 later decisions — most recently April 2023 · most notably Martinez v. Johnson (2001), Fabela v. Socorro Independent School District (2003)

17 federal appellate · 2 district ·

380200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Monell v. Department of Social Services of City of New York · Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp. · Mitchell v. Forsyth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 59 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a defendant government official is sued in his individual and official capacity, and the city or state is also sued,”
    5 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Summary judgment is proper only `if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that the moving party is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.'”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “Courts of Appeals consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the nonmovant, yet the nonmovant may not rely on mere allegations in the pleadings; rather, the nonmovant must respond to the motion for summary judgment by setting forth particular facts indicating that there is a genuine issue for trial.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.