Kapadia v. Tally’s Empirical Analysis
229 F.3d 641 · 2000
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Rav v. City of St Paul Minnesota · United States v. Abel · Barclay v. Florida · United States Department of Treasury v. Fabe · Wisconsin v. Mitchell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“did take the comments into consideration because one of the things [the court has] to consider is the possibility of reformation of the defendant. How likely is this defendant to be restored to useful citizenship.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[n]othing in the Constitution prevents the sentencing court from factoring a defendant's statements into sentencing when those statements are relevant to the crime or to legitimate sentencing considerations .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“just another way of stating that Kapadia presented a threat of future dangerousness to the community, a proper consideration under Barclay and Mitchell .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.