Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

229 F. App'x 533

Fields v. McClory

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided April 24, 2007

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2007-04-24

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Doi v. Halekulani Corp.

Decided 2007-04-24

¶1MEMORANDUM

¶2Philip Fields appeals pro se from the district court's judgment enforcing a settlement agreement in his action alleging unlawful eviction and disability rights violations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review for abuse of discretion, Doi v. Halekulani Corp., 276 F.3d 1131, 1136 (9th Cir.2002), and we affirm.

¶3The district court did not abuse its discretion by entering the order enforcing the settlement agreement, because the record shows Fields entered into a binding settlement agreement in open court, and Fields has failed to demonstrate how any of the terms of the written release are inconsistent with that agreement. See id. at 1140.

¶4We find Fields’ remaining contentions unpersuasive.

¶5AFFIRMED.

¶6 This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

/229/fappx/533 · .json · Public domain