229 F. Supp. 2d 105 - Torres Maysonet v. Drillex, S.E.’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
32 district ·
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1367 · 42 U.S.C. § 4901 (Noise Control Act of 1972) · 42 U.S.C. § 7401 (Air Quality Act of 1967) · 42 U.S.C. § 7604
Relies on United Mine Workers of America v. Gibbs · Middlesex County Sewerage Authority v. National Sea Clammers Assn. · Rodriguez v. Doral Mortgage Corp. · Dynamic Image Technologies, Inc. v. United States · Garcia v. Cecos International, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(a)Notice of intent to file suit pursuant to section 12(a)(1) of the Act shall be served upon an alleged violator of a noise control requirement issued under the Act in the following manner: (1) If the alleged violator is a private individual or a corporation, service of notice shall be accomplished by registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed to, or by personal service upon, the owner or managing agent of the equipment, plant, facility, vehicle, or activity alleged to be in violation. A copy of the notice shall be mailed to the Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency, the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Agency for the region in which such violation is alleged to have occurred.... If the alleged violator is a corporation, a copy of such notice also shall be mailed to the registered agent, if any, of such corporation in the State in which such violation is alleged to have occurred. (2) If the alleged violator is a State or local government entity, service of notice shall be accomplished by registered mail, return receipt requested, addressed to, or by personal service upon, the head of such agency. A copy of such notice shall be mailed to the Administrator of the. Environmental Protection Agency, the Regional Administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency for the region in which such violation is alleged to have occurred .... (Emphasis ours). (3)If the alleged violator is a Federal agency, service of notice shall be accomplished by reg”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Colon v. Diaz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.