Shields v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 2619 (§ 20 of the Toxic Substances Control Act of 1976) · 16 U.S.C. § 1531 (§ 2 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1532 (§ 3 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1533 (§ 4 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1536 (§ 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1538 (§ 9 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 1540 (§ 11 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973) · 16 U.S.C. § 544M
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Abbott Laboratories v. Gardner · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Califano v. Sanders
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.