Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 Ga. App. 124 - Walker v. Virtual Packaging, LLC

229 Ga. App. 124 - Walker v. Virtual Packaging, LLC’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

29 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently October 2012 · most notably 240 Ga. App. 445 - Pyle v. City of Cedartown (1999), 265 Ga. App. 343 - Marquis Towers, Inc. v. Highland Group (2004)

29 state decisions

190199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lau's Corp., Inc. v. Haskins · Phoenix Airline Services, Inc. v. Metro Airlines, Inc. · 222 Ga. App. 763 - Aycock v. Calk · 221 Ga. App. 621 - Bradley v. British Fitting Group, PLC · 214 Ga. App. 259 - Reaugh v. Inner Harbour Hospital, Ltd.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a trial court’s authority to do so is not unlimited. The grant of summary judgment must be proper in all other respects. This means that in addition to ensuring the record supports such a judgment, the trial court must ensure that the party against whom summary judgment is rendered is given full and fair notice and opportunity to respond prior to entry of summary judgment. The crucial point is to ensure that the party against whom summary judgment is sought has had a full and final opportunity to meet and attempt to controvert the assertions against him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.