State v. Grantom’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

12 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. ““The United States Supreme Court has held that a sentence predicated on false information denies the defendant due process of law, Townsend v. Burke, 334 U.S. 736, 740-41 , 92 L. Ed. 1690 , 68 S. Ct. 1252 (1948), and a sentence so rendered requires vacation and remand for resentencing. United States v. Tucker, 404 U.S. 443, 447 , 30 L. Ed. 2d 592 , 92 S. Ct. 589 (1972). To meet due process requirements, the sentencing procedure must afford a defendant the opportunity to deny or explain information considered in determining the appropriate sentence. Gardner v. Florida, 430 U.S. 349, 362 , 51 L. Ed. 2d 393 , 97 S. Ct. 1197 (1977); Williams v. New York, 337 U.S. 241 , 93 L. Ed. 1337 , 69 S. Ct. 1079 (1949).” Grantom, 229 Kan. at 518-19 .”

   2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
   e.g. State v. Borders · State v. Scales