State v. Everson’s Empirical Analysis
1981
Citation profile
44 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 46 later decisions — most recently December 2008 · most notably State v. Bishop (1987), State v. Chatmon (1983)
44 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Arney · State v. Peoples · State v. Prince · State v. Blue · State v. Hays
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 46 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Declaration of a mistrial is a matter entrusted to the trial court’s discretion. K.S.A. 22-3423. All rape trials involve the risk of emotional outbursts- by the complaining witness. When there is no proof of substantial prejudice to the appellant, it cannot be held that the trial court abused the exercise of its power of discretion in denying the mistrial. See State v. Baker, 227 Kan. 377, 383 , 607 P.2d 61 (1980).” 229 Kan. at 543.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. State v. Chears
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.