Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 Ky. 264 - Campbell v. Commonwealth

Campbell v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
1
states following
February 2004
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently February 2004

21 state decisions

100192919301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co. · Joseph Patsone v. Commonwealth of Pennsylvania · Central Lumber Company v. State of South Dakota · Craig v. O'Rear · Smith v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A] state may classify with reference to the evil to be prevented, and ... if the class discriminated against is or reasonably might be considered to define those from -whom the evil mainly is to be feared, it properly may be picked out. A lack of abstract symmetry does not matter. The question is a practical one, dependent upon experience.... The state may direct its law against what it deems the evil as it actually exists without covering the whole field of possible abuses.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.