Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 LA 355 - Resweber v. Jacob

Resweber v. Jacob’s Empirical Analysis

1956

Citation profile

18
cited by 18 later decisions
1
states following
April 1961
most recently cited

18 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Ducre v. Succession of Ducre · State v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co. · Bascle v. Perez · Harding v. Hackney · Roberson v. Isacks

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ * * * Citation of the appellee is essential to the appeal unless the motion or petition is presented in open court during the same term at which the judgment was rendered. Article 574, Code of Practice. When, as here, the appeal is applied for by motion presented in chambers and the appellant does not pray for or otherwise request issuance and service of citation and no service is made, the appeal must be dismissed. State v. Salmen Brick & Lumber Co., 149 La. 968 , 90 So. 273 ; Ducre v. Succession of Ducre, 167 La. 133 , 118 So. 864 ; Harding v. Hackney, 189 La. 132 , 179 So. 58 , and Bascle v. Perez, 224 La. 1014 , 71 So.2d 551 .””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““This is unnecessary. Whatever right the appellant may have, in this respect, exists independently of such reservation.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.