Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 229 Md. 208 - Bennett v. State

Bennett v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1962

Citation profile

53
cited by 53 later decisions
3
states following
July 2005
most recently cited

2 district · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 53 later decisions — most recently July 2005 · most notably Newton v. State (1977), Thomas v. State (1976)

2 district · 51 state decisions

17019621970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Blockburger v. United States · Palko v. State of Connecticut · Bartkus v. People of State of Illinois · Diaz v. United States · Gavieres v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 53 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘Each of the offenses created requires proof of a different element. The applicable rule is that where the same act or transaction constitutes a violation of two distinct statutory provisions, the test to be applied to determine whether there are two offenses or only one, is whether each provision requires proof of a fact which the other does not.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““That no person shall, for the same offense, be twice put in jeopardy, is both a provision of the Constitution of the United States, and an established rule of the common law, and a plea of former jeopardy is good under either. The rule forbids a second trial for the same offense whether the accused at the former trial was acquitted or convicted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.