229 Md. App. 24 - Gross v. State’s Empirical Analysis
2016
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2022
most recently cited
10 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. United States · Conyers v. State · State v. Hutchinson · State v. Simms · Holcombe v. U.S. Airways, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“was not relying on special knowledge, skill, or training to interpret the GPS records for the [ ] truck, nor did he 'engage[ ] in a process to derive his conclusion ... that was beyond the ken of an average person.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“on the days where the truck was used in scrap transactions, it would generally be at or near [a] warehouse at some point shortly before being at or near one of the scrap yards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State“expert testimony is not necessary for the admission of records of GPS data, where the witness merely reads the GPS data as it appears in the records.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Johnson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.